Sompoo Naranunn MD1, Supreeya Techatipakorn MD2, Nilubon Chaikomol BNS1, Chunya Sirisil MNS1
Affiliation : 1 Orthopedic Department, Udonthani Center Hospital, Udonthani, Thailand 2 Radiology Department, Bangkok Udon Hospital, Udonthani, Thaniland
Background : Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the surgical treatment for osteoarthritis knee. Results of treatment are
measured by clinical outcome and by longevity of the implant. The coronal plane axis of the tibial implant and the mechanical
axis alignment of the leg are factors affecting outcome of the surgery. Mechanical axis malalignment results in early loosening,
limited function, and reduced survivorship.
Objective : To determine if good tibial alignment correlates with mechanical axis alignment and clinical outcome.
Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 62 TKA patients. All TKAs were done by a single
surgeon. The surgical protocol included the use of computer-assisted surgery and antibiotic cementing of the posterior
cruciate-retaining knee without resurfacing of the patella. Preoperative, postoperative clinical outcome, WOMAC score, and
KSS was record. One year postoperative x-rays (tibia implant alignment, mechanical axis alignment) and clinical outcomes
(WOMAC score, KSS) were record. The patients were classified as good tibial alignment (Group A) if the tibia implant
alignment was +2° of the tibia axis (neutral) and outlier tibial alignment (group B) if the tibia implant alignment was more than
92° or less than 88°. Clinical outcomes and the mechanical axis of good tibial alignment and outlier tibial alignment patients
were compared. The good tibial alignment group was subdivided into neutral mechanical alignment (Group A1) if the
mechanical axis alignment was +3° and outlier mechanical alignment (group A2) if the mechanical axis was less than 177° or
more than 183°. WOMAC score and KSS were compared between the good tibial alignment and neutral mechanical alignment
group (Group A1) and the good tibial alignment and outlier mechanical alignment group (Group A2).
Results : The good tibial alignment group had significantly better postoperative mechanical alignment than the outlier tibial
alignment group (p = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in WOMAC score (p = 0.18) between the
groups, but the good tibial alignment group had significantly higher (better) KSS scores (p = 0.04). Between the good tibial
alignment with neutral mechanical alignment group and the good tibial alignment with outlier mechanical alignment group,
there was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcome with either WOMAC score or KSS.
Conclusion : Tibia implant alignment in the coronal plane is one factor that affects postoperative mechanical axis alignment.
If the tibial implant alignment is within +2° of neutral (90°), then the mechanical axis will be better aligned, although clinical
outcome may not be improved. Clinical outcome was not correlated with tibial implant alignment within +2° of neutral with
mechanical axis alignment deviation of less than 3° and tibial implant alignment within +2° of neutral but with alignment
deviation greater than 3°.
Keywords : Total knee arthroplasty, Coronal tibial alignment, Mechanical axis alignment, Clinical outcome, Osteoarthritis knee
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
4th Floor, Royal Golden Jubilee Building,
2 Soi Soonvijai, New Petchburi road,
Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Phone: 0-2716-6102, 0-2716-6962
Fax: 0-2314-6305
Email: editor@jmatonline.com
» Online Submissions » Author Guidelines » Copyright Notice » Privacy Statement
» Journal Sponsorship » Site Map » About this Publishing System
© MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. All Rights Reserved. The content of this site is intended for health professionals.