Comparison of Spinal Alignment between XLIF,
TLIF, PLIF, and PLF in the Treatment of Single Level
Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study
Ekkapoj Korwutthikulrangsri MD¹, Kritchapong Junsri MD¹, Monchai Ruangchainikom MD¹,
Werasak Sutipornpalangkul PhD, MD¹
Affiliation : ¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Background: Most lumbar spinal fusion procedures are performed to increase fusion potential, correct a deformity, and decompress spinal nerve
roots. Nowadays, there are several spinal fusion techniques such as extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody
fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and posterolateral fusion (PLF). However, there are no studies directly comparing their
capacity to alter lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, intervertebral disc height, foraminal height, and the grade of slip for treating single level
spondylolisthesis in Thailand.
Objective: To compare which lumbar interbody technique amongst XLIF, TLIF, PLIF, and PLF, is the most effective in restoring spinal alignment in cases such as lumbar lordosis, increased segmental lordosis, increased intervertebral disc height, increased foraminal height, and a reduced slip grade in spondylolisthesis patients.
Materials and Methods: The medical records and radiographs of single level spondylolisthesis patients treated in Siriraj hospital between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and radiographic parameters such as lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, intervertebral disc height, foraminal height, and grade of slip, including preoperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. An inter-observer/ intra-observer reliability test for all parameters was also performed.
Results: Two hundred forty patients including 192 females and 48 males with a mean age of 60.1 years were included in the present study. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic data except in younger patients in the PLF group and those with shorter length of stays in the XLIF group. The present study results indicated that there was a statistically significant increase in lumbar lordosis, increased foraminal height, and decreased slip grade in the XLIF group when compared to other three groups as TLIF, PLIF, and PLF.
Conclusion: All spinal fusion techniques could improve lumbar spinal alignment, however, XLIF is superior to other procedures, especially in lumbar lordosis, foraminal height restoration, and slip grade.
Received 12 July 2021 | Revised 26 October 2021 | Accepted 27 October 2021
doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.12.13136
Keywords :
Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Posterior lumbar
interbody fusion; Posterolateral fusion; Lumbar lordosis
All Articles
Download