Submit manuscript

Effect of Proximal Oxygen Adding to a Bag Valve Mask with a Mechanical Filter in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Jittiya Watcharotayangul¹, Gorranit Thummata¹, Kittiya Srisitpisarn¹, Tanit Virankabutra¹, Thanyalak Thamjamrassri¹

Affiliation : ¹ Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Background: Preoxygenation using a bag valve mask (BVM) with a filter is recommended to reduce the risk of viral transmission. Preoxygenation in hypoxaemic patients may require a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve. Applying a filter to a BVM with or without a PEEP valve can increase resistance and work of breathing.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of proximal oxygen added to BVM with mechanical filter in healthy volunteers.
Materials and Methods: The present study was a crossover trial that randomized 48 volunteers to receive four preoxygenation techniques: BVM with a filter as group F, BVM with a filter and proximal oxygen as group FO, BVM with a filter and PEEP valve as group FP, and BVM with a filter, PEEP valve, and proximal oxygen as group FPO. Fraction of expired oxygen (FEO₂) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were measured. Comfort was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The primary outcome was FEO₂ at five minutes.
Results: Data from 46 volunteers were analyzed. Adding oxygen proximal to the filter in the FO group increased FEO₂ at five minutes by 7.07% (95% CI 4.87 to 9.26) and decreased the time to reach FEO₂ 90% by 301.74 seconds (95% CI 282.82 to 320.66) compared with the times in group F. Similarly, supplemental proximal oxygen including a PEEP valve increased FEO₂ at five minutes by 6.07% (95% CI 3.87 to 8.26) and decreased the time to reach FEO₂ 90% by 242.13 seconds (95% CI 223.21 to 261.05). CPAP was 2.27, 3.61, 11.65, and 13.14 mmHg in group F, FO, FP, and FPO, respectively. The NRS score was 6.51 and 6.07 in groups F and FO, and 3.15 and 3.70 in groups FP and FPO, respectively.
Conclusion: Adding proximal oxygen to a BVM with a filter improved the efficacy of preoxygenation.

Received 17 October 2022 | Revised 10 November 2022 | Accepted 2 December 2022
DOI: 10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.01.13739

Keywords : Bag valve mask; Efficacy of preoxygenation; Healthy volunteers; Mechanical filter; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Positive endexpiratory pressure valve



All Articles Download


INFORMATION

Contact info

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
4th Floor, Royal Golden Jubilee Building,
2 Soi Soonvijai, New Petchburi road,
Bangkok 10310, Thailand.
Phone: 0-2716-6102, 0-2716-6962
Fax: 0-2314-6305
Email: editor@jmatonline.com

JMed Assoc Thai
MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND
ISSN: 0125-2208 (Print),
ISSN: 2408-1981 (Online)
The content of this site is intended for health professionals.

Submissions

» Online Submissions » Author Guidelines » Copyright Notice » Privacy Statement

Other

» Journal Sponsorship » Site Map » About this Publishing System

© MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND. All Rights Reserved. The content of this site is intended for health professionals.