Views: 1,429 | Downloads:
150
| Responses: 0
| XML | Respond to this article | Alert & updates | Request permissions | Email to a friend |
Original ArticleOpen Access
Comparison of Amplitude and Area Decrement in Repetitive Nerve Stimulation
Boonhong J 
Objective: To access the percentage of the patients whose repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) studies were
negative for 10% amplitude decrement but positive for 10% area decrement and to compare these disagreed
results with specialist physician’s diagnosis.
Study Design: Retrospective descriptive study.
Setting: Electrodiagnosis laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial
Hospital.
Material and Method: All of the electromyography (EMG) reports of RNS studies were reviewed. Both 10%
amplitude and area decrement were used as criteria for diagnosis in each patient. The disagreed results would
be compared to final diagnosis of the specialist physicians that were recorded in out-patient medical records.
Results: Eighty-three reports were included in the present study. Nineteen records (22.9%) were negative for
10% amplitude decrement but positive for 10% area decrement. Three records (3.6%) were positive for 10%
amplitude decrement but negative for 10% area decrement. Twenty-two patients had disagreed results.
Sixteen disagreed out-patient medical records (72.7%) were available for review the final specialist doctors’
diagnosis. About 69% of patients, whose test was negative for 10% amplitude decrement but positive for 10%
area decrement, were diagnosed as myasthenia gravis (MG) or suspected MG. All of the patients, whose test
was negative for 10% area decrement but positive for 10% amplitude decrement, were diagnosed as MG. The
use of both 10% amplitude and area decrement instead of 10% amplitude decrement alone will provide
additional diagnostic yields in about 13% of the cases.
Conclusion: Twenty-three percent of patients had disagreed RNS results that were negative for 10% amplitude
decrement but positive for 10% area decrement. When these disagreed results were compared to the final
diagnosis of specialist doctors, 69% of these patients were diagnosed or suspected and treated as MG. Using
both 10% amplitude and area decrement may improve sensitivity of MG diagnosis in about 13% of the cases.
Keywords: Repetitive nerve stimulation, Amplitude decrement, Area decrement
negative for 10% amplitude decrement but positive for 10% area decrement and to compare these disagreed
results with specialist physician’s diagnosis.
Study Design: Retrospective descriptive study.
Setting: Electrodiagnosis laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial
Hospital.
Material and Method: All of the electromyography (EMG) reports of RNS studies were reviewed. Both 10%
amplitude and area decrement were used as criteria for diagnosis in each patient. The disagreed results would
be compared to final diagnosis of the specialist physicians that were recorded in out-patient medical records.
Results: Eighty-three reports were included in the present study. Nineteen records (22.9%) were negative for
10% amplitude decrement but positive for 10% area decrement. Three records (3.6%) were positive for 10%
amplitude decrement but negative for 10% area decrement. Twenty-two patients had disagreed results.
Sixteen disagreed out-patient medical records (72.7%) were available for review the final specialist doctors’
diagnosis. About 69% of patients, whose test was negative for 10% amplitude decrement but positive for 10%
area decrement, were diagnosed as myasthenia gravis (MG) or suspected MG. All of the patients, whose test
was negative for 10% area decrement but positive for 10% amplitude decrement, were diagnosed as MG. The
use of both 10% amplitude and area decrement instead of 10% amplitude decrement alone will provide
additional diagnostic yields in about 13% of the cases.
Conclusion: Twenty-three percent of patients had disagreed RNS results that were negative for 10% amplitude
decrement but positive for 10% area decrement. When these disagreed results were compared to the final
diagnosis of specialist doctors, 69% of these patients were diagnosed or suspected and treated as MG. Using
both 10% amplitude and area decrement may improve sensitivity of MG diagnosis in about 13% of the cases.
Keywords: Repetitive nerve stimulation, Amplitude decrement, Area decrement
Download:
PDF