J Med Assoc Thai 2002; 85 (3):320

Views: 1,459 | Downloads: 22 | Responses: 0

PDF XML Respond to this article Print Alert & updates Request permissions Email to a friend


A Comparative Study of Diagnostic Tests for Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: Polymerase Chain Reaction vs Histopathology and Clinical Diagnosis
Hirunwiwatkul P Mail, Tumwasorn S , Chantranuwat C , Sirichai U

SOMYING TUMWASORN, M.Sc., Ph.D.**,
UKKAPORN SIRICHAI, M.D.*
To compare diagnostic tests for tuberculous lymphadenitis by polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) with histopathology and clinical diagnosis in sensitivity, specificity and predictive value.
This retrospective analytic, single blind study was done at King Chulalongkom Memorial Hospital.
Paraffin-embedded specimens were classified into 2 groups. The study group contained 30 proved
AFB positive paraffin-embedded specimens from patients who also had clinical diagnosis of tuber-
culosis and improved by antituberculous treatment. The control group contained 30 formalin-fixed,
paraffin-embedded specimens of lymph node hyperplasia proved by histopathological and clinical
review. All 60 specimens were slided, and systematically labeled and sent to PCR lab. Polymerase
Chain Reaction method had sensitivity = 43.33 per cent, specificity = 100 per cent, positive pre-
dictive value =100 per cent and negative predictive value = 63.83 per cent. The present findings
revealed that the PCR results were related to the age of the paraffin-embedded tissues. No positive
results were obtained from tissues kept since 1996. Positive results were obtained in 317 cases
(42.86%), 2/3 (66.67%) and 8/lO cases (80%) from tissue of 1997, 1998 and 1999 respectively.
Conclusion : Polymerase chain reaction has sufficient reliability best as a confirmatory
diagnostic test for tuberculous lymphadenitis; however, it is not appropriate as a screening test.
Key word : Tuberculous Lymphadenitis, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Histopathology, Clinical
Diagnosis

Download: PDF