J Med Assoc Thai 2015; 98 (11):1119

Views: 1,552 | Downloads: 55 | Responses: 0

PDF XML Respond to this article Print Alert & updates Request permissions Email to a friend


The Difference of Treatment Results between Botulinum Toxin A Split Injection Sites and Botulinum Toxin A Non-Split Injection Sites for Hemifacial Spasm
Prutthipongsit A , Aui-aree N Mail

Objective: To compare hemifacial spasm treatment results between Botulinum toxin A split injection sites and Botulinum toxin A non-split injection sites.

Material and Method: Thirty-one hemifacial spasm patients were randomly assigned into the non-split injection sites group (injecting Botulinum toxin A to the zygomaticus major and risorius each) or split injection sites group with the same amount of Botulinum toxin A as the first method (injection Botulinum toxin A to the zygomaticus major and minor and risorius two injections each) The main outcomes are onset of improvement and effective duration of treatment.

Results: Fifteen patients were assigned to non-split injection sites group and 16 patients were assigned to split injection sites group. The median onset of improvement in non-split injection sites group and split injection sites group was 4.0 and 4.5 days, respectively (p = 0.984). The effective duration of treatment in the non-split injection sites group was 60.0 days and in the split injection sites group was 54.5 days (p = 0.582).

Conclusion: The splitting of injection sites did not significantly improve the efficacy of Botulinum toxin A in the treatment of hemifacial spasm.

Keywords: Botulinum toxin, Hemifacial spasm, Dysport®


Download: PDF