Views: 1,380 | Downloads:
138
| Responses: 0
| XML | Respond to this article | Alert & updates | Request permissions | Email to a friend |
Case ReportOpen Access
Early Maxillary Arch Changes in Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Report of Four Cases
Keinprasit C 
,
Kuratchatchaval C
,
Kuratchatchaval C Objective: To evaluate early maxillary arch changes in infants with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), using a
simple measurement technique.
Material and Method: A measurement model technique simplified from previously reported methods was used to analyze
early maxillary changes of four non-syndromic complete BCLP. Study models of these cases were evaluated before presurgical
orthopedic treatment and lip reconstruction (T1) and prior to palatal closure (T2). Comparisons of maxillary arch changes
were performed.
Results: At T1, protrusion with or without deviation of the primary palate and different amounts of cleft width were found.
Anterior alveolar arch width was larger than the posterior. At T2, the primary palate was retracted and initial lateral
displacement was corrected. Cleft widths were narrowed at all levels with the narrowest part located anteriorly, corresponding
with the increasing of primary palate arch width. Posterior alveolar arch width was wider than the anterior region.
Although the posterior alveolar arch was lengthened, total alveolar arch length was decreased which could be attributable to
a large retraction of the primary palate.
Conclusion: Early morphological and positional changes to the three segments of maxillary arch could be visualized and
clarified with this technique, using study models and arch form superimposition methods.
Keywords: Maxillary arch changes, Maxillary arch form, Bilateral cleft lip and palate
simple measurement technique.
Material and Method: A measurement model technique simplified from previously reported methods was used to analyze
early maxillary changes of four non-syndromic complete BCLP. Study models of these cases were evaluated before presurgical
orthopedic treatment and lip reconstruction (T1) and prior to palatal closure (T2). Comparisons of maxillary arch changes
were performed.
Results: At T1, protrusion with or without deviation of the primary palate and different amounts of cleft width were found.
Anterior alveolar arch width was larger than the posterior. At T2, the primary palate was retracted and initial lateral
displacement was corrected. Cleft widths were narrowed at all levels with the narrowest part located anteriorly, corresponding
with the increasing of primary palate arch width. Posterior alveolar arch width was wider than the anterior region.
Although the posterior alveolar arch was lengthened, total alveolar arch length was decreased which could be attributable to
a large retraction of the primary palate.
Conclusion: Early morphological and positional changes to the three segments of maxillary arch could be visualized and
clarified with this technique, using study models and arch form superimposition methods.
Keywords: Maxillary arch changes, Maxillary arch form, Bilateral cleft lip and palate
Download:
PDF